Stacey's Web Page

Imperial, the Highest Stage of Capitalism

Home
About Me
Fall 2005
Claim of Fact
A Fist in the eye of God
Concept Formation: Attributes Dynamically Inhabited From Conscious Awareness
Women, Sex And Darwin
Darwin
Pedagogy Of The Oppressed
Neurology Summary
Emotional Intelligence
The Intellegent Eye
The Allegory of the Cave
Psychology From A Culturec Perspective
Thinking Styles
Who I Am, How I Learn
Winter 2006
Claim of Fact
The Sane Society
Rethinking Primate Aggression
Domination & Subbordination
Blaming The Victim
The Social Construction of Reality & Stigma & Social Identity
Economic Justice: The American Class System
Deconstructing the Underclass & Constructing Race, Creating White Privilege
Citizenship as a Source of Obligation
Better Together: Restoring the American Community
Imperial, the Highest Stage
Imperialism 101, Shooting an Elephant & The Gentleman of the Jungle
Spring 2006

Schiefelbein, Stacey

Winter 2006

Rhodes 182F

Reflection

 

Imperial, the Highest Stage of Capitalism

Lenin

 

Is a society with monopolies worse off because of them?

What are the advantages of a monopoly?

 

            I’m not going to lie, I don’t know a whole lot of Imperialism, or Capitalism, but I have played Monopoly by Milton Bradley a few times, so when the word monopoly came up I had a good idea of what the article was going to cover. It’s sort of like the game, when certain people take over certain things and someone gets screwed in the end. Either they owe someone cash or end up in jail without passing go or collecting two-hundred dollars.

            Is a society better off with or with out monopolies? I believe a single society can benefit from a monopoly. If one society owns all the resources they need to survive, then yes a monopoly would work out okay, but here is the thing it never works out like that, ever. There is always going to be a neighboring society that has that one (or several hundred) different resources your society needs to remain in existence. In a sense monopolies are selfish and have invested large amounts of time and money in their self-interests. Monopoly takes (owns) all of one resource and anyone that wants any of that resource has to pay usually an inflated price for the resource or good. Monopolies are out there to make the dollar. That brings me to the advantages of a monopoly.

            To everything one has there has to be a good side, or what is the point in having ownership in it. For monopolies it is all about making the green thing we call cash. Also monopolies can use their power as a society control. As a monopoly you have the manipulation factor working on your side, if you own all of a resource, and some country needs some, you don’t have to give them any, unless they meet the requests you have set…or if they blow your ass up and steal your monopoly from your hands and then it wouldn’t be such a good thing.

            Just like anything else in life, everything has a good and bad side, its perks and its disadvantages. I wouldn’t mind having my own monopoly, I’m pretty sure I could handle the manipulative money source power trip.

Enter supporting content here

Stacey Schiefelbein